Drug makers, understandably, don’t like to talk about raising prices. When they must, companies often cite the hefty investment required to develop new treatments, as some do in today’s WSJ article on the pricing issue . But there’s another force that helps explain why 2010′s price increases were the biggest in recent years. Companies are facing a huge revenue shortfall as their blockbuster products lose patent protection. Like squirrels gathering nuts for winter, drug makers must collect as much revenue as they can before major sources dry up, say industry experts. “Industry is under a lot of cost pressure,” Ed Schoonveld, a pricing consultant at ZS Associates and author of a new book on the subject, “The Price of Global Health,” tells the Health Blog. “Like everybody else, companies are trying to make ends meet,” he says. Credit Suisse’s Catherine Arnold tells the Health Blog that the price increases have helped companies keep sales growth chugging along, albeit at lower rates than before. An analysis by Richard Evans and Scott Hinds at Sector & Sovereign Research concludes that companies’ “reliance on real pricing growth is perhaps greater than it’s ever been.” The calculus of drug pricing is complicated. Beyond R&D expenses and looming patent expirations, the value a drug provides is a factor. So is the cost of rival treatments. Indeed, Evans, who
Excerpt from:
Drug Price Increases Come As Companies Peer Over Patent Cliff


John


